Fixed fee. Hours by grade.
The client sees $96,000. You see 400 hours by grade, partner to analyst, and which grade is running hot, this morning.
Industries · Global consulting firms
A $96,000 fixed fee sized at 400 hours is a number only the engagement team knows. Ceed counts every hour against it as it is logged, by grade, and holds the one that would cross it.
For the practice inside a large firm. The firm’s ledger, timesheet and billing stay where they are.
406.0 of 400 h
Thu 3 Sep · 6.0 h · Operating model deck, third read by the steering committee · Ines M.
Held for approval. 6.0 h over the engagement budget.
$96,000
the fixed fee for phase one
400 h
the hours behind it, by grade
$240
the hour past it, on a signed change request
$96
Ceed, this month
The engagement review lands in the fourth week. By then the team has booked forty and worked fifty, because nobody wanted to be the one who blew the budget. The partner reads a healthy margin. The hours were real. They went missing between the timesheet and the review.
“Then I’m getting hounded on utilization so if I eat hours my realization is better but then it looks like I’m not doing the work. I’m only a senior and don’t understand why this is my problem.”
An audit senior, on Fishbowl, about 2022.
Ceed counts every hour against the budget you sized the fee with, by person and by grade, as it is logged. The hour that would cross it waits for the engagement partner that day, with its reason attached. Nothing is eaten. The next fee is priced on the hours this one took.
Every engagement’s budget, every morning. Visible to the partners and whoever they name.
The hour that would push a client over budget is saved, marked, and waits for a yes or no. Nothing is billed quietly. Nothing disappears.
6.0 h · Ashgrove Utilities · Operating model deck, third read
Over the 400-hour budget. Waiting for the engagement partner.
On change request 1 at $240. The client signed on Friday, before the steering committee.
The client sees $96,000. You see 400 hours by grade, partner to analyst, and which grade is running hot, this morning.
An independent consultant on a day rate logs to the same budget. Her statement is computed from the entries your invoice used, at her rate, never at the client’s.
Hours past the budget bill only on a signed change request. The hour waits while you ask. If the answer is no, it stays on the record as the hour the firm gave away, in the open.
Computed from the statement of work dated 8 Jun 2026. Handed to your billing team as a document. The firm’s system sends it.
What people at the largest firms say in public about eating hours, budgets that blow, and the billable hour after AI. Linked and dated. Not our words.
I have never seen an administrative process managed so effectively (and aggressively) as time sheets with Big 4
… If you unpack it, it makes sense why they are that way. Probably years of delinquencies with same people
Their bonuses got dinked apparently
McKinsey already generates 25% of its fees from outcomes-based pricing. Strategy advice accounts for less than 20% of the firm’s work. …
The pricing math is structural. In billable hours, AI productivity means more output per hour, more revenue per consultant. In outcomes-based pricing, AI productivity means same outcome delivered faster, less revenue per project. …
Accenture $ACN is down 58% in a year. One of the great compounders of the last decade, wiped out.
… Now the tool may not need a teacher. The work that fills billable hours, the coding, the testing, the documentation, is exactly what agentic AI does first and cheapest.
You can’t partner with clients while you bill them hourly.
Hourly billing is an adversarial structure. You profit when things take longer. They profit when things go faster.
That’s not a partnership. That’s a conflict of interest.
Invoice $96,000 this month for Ashgrove Utilities and Ceed costs $96. A practice invoicing $4 million a month pays $4,000. Ceed charges 0.1% of the invoices it computes, so an engagement the firm bills without Ceed costs nothing. No seats, no tiers, no minimum.
No. The firm’s timesheet feeds the firm’s ledger at month end, and billing stays where it is. Ceed is the practice’s own record of hours against engagement budgets. It holds the hour the firm’s system reports three weeks later. Pulling time from the firm’s system is not built today. Write to hello@ceed.so and a person replies.
Yes, and it takes under a minute a day, from Slack. The Friday timesheet is for the ledger. Ceed’s entry counts against the engagement budget the moment it is logged. The partner sees the crossing on Thursday, not in the review three weeks later.
Whoever logs the hour that crosses it. The hold shows to that person and to the engagement partner, with the entry and its reason. The contractor’s statement waits with it. Nobody is asked to book forty and work fifty.
Because the fee was sized in hours by grade, and the margin is still the fee less the cost of the hours. The client sees the fee. You see whether it still fits the work, and the next one is priced on what this one took.
The hours left on the engagement are visible to the people who log them, so they can see the edge. Rates, cost and margin are visible only to the people you grant, and the server enforces it.
From the blog: Held. Not hidden. The agreement said 40 hours. The month said 47. Other firms Ceed is for: Management consulting · IT consulting · Accounting and fractional CFOs · all nineteen.